tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9031852996869768738.post737671805579691223..comments2024-03-28T08:30:20.260+01:00Comments on The Ugley Vicar: Swine 'flu: how bad might it get?Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03590979027426082714noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9031852996869768738.post-78391839793469887862009-07-14T11:11:56.504+01:002009-07-14T11:11:56.504+01:00Peter, I agree (!), though it should be noted that...Peter, I agree (!), though it should be noted that hand contact is thought to be a way of spreading 'flu, and therefore hand washing may reduce this possibility.<br /><br />I am not sure, but I suspect that anti-bacterial gel may be quite effective in breaking down the protein wall of a virus, and therefore killing it. The important thing, though, is anti-biotics won't help much!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03590979027426082714noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9031852996869768738.post-18728691639965553192009-07-14T11:04:50.595+01:002009-07-14T11:04:50.595+01:00John, thanks for talking some sense about this. Th...John, thanks for talking some sense about this. The panic measures my parish has been taking about communion, changing to intinction, now turn out to "increase the possibility of spreading the virus". But then the bishop's advice is also faulty, or at least lacking credibility, for suggesting "antibacterial gel" to combat a virus.Peter Kirkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13395635409427347613noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9031852996869768738.post-39230832270824157192009-07-14T10:13:43.292+01:002009-07-14T10:13:43.292+01:00Just a couple of quotes from the Chief Medical Off...Just a couple of <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/uk-swine-flu-cases-to-soar-but-deaths-will-remain-rare-1742751.html" rel="nofollow">quotes from the Chief Medical Officer this morning</a> of a non-Corporal Jones variety,<br /><br />"Britain can expect an "explosion" in swine flu cases this winter, but deaths among healthy people will remain rare – unless the virus mutates or mixes with another virus, the Chief Medical Officer said yesterday."<br /><br />"Professor Field said: 'I think the surprise is that it hasn't spread quicker, and though the second wave is likely to be worse, there is a question mark over whether we should keep giving Tamiflu to healthy adults for what has turned out to be a relatively mild virus.'"Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03590979027426082714noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9031852996869768738.post-18393482144082303782009-07-14T09:48:37.078+01:002009-07-14T09:48:37.078+01:00Peter, according to the NHS, working from figures ...Peter, <a href="http://ugleyvicar.blogspot.com/2009/07/swine-flu-update.html" rel="nofollow">according to the NHS</a>, working from figures supplied by the WHO, the Swine 'flu death rate is likely to be <i>significantly</i> below 0.4% so the death rate, even in a 'very bad case' scenario as you outline, would be substantially less than 80,000.<br /><br />Let us say, for the sake of argument, it is 40,000. That is a lot of people, and almost double the last worse 'flu epidemic of 1989-90, but not 'apocalyptic' - not even on the scale of the 1918 global outbreak.<br /><br />My point is that (a) 'flu happens, (b) most people who can catch it probably will because transmission is so easy and one is contagious before one is symptomatic (c) we didn't have this media panic last time. Maybe I could add as a (d) death is inevitable, one way or the other.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03590979027426082714noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9031852996869768738.post-53198201995528860592009-07-14T00:15:02.896+01:002009-07-14T00:15:02.896+01:00John,
I don't think you are getting the point ...John,<br />I don't think you are getting the point yet. Swine Flu is quite contagious. If there is a 0.5% mortality rate and if, as currently expected, 30% of the UK population catch it this year, then that is 20 million people who caught the flu, and 100,000 deaths. Or, if you take the modelling which predicted 100,000 new infections per day; then that would mean 500 deaths per day. <br />I believe this is why health care professionals are taking this extremely seriously. I'm not sure your current policy on this is a wise one. I would recommend running your ideas on this subject past a doctor in your parish. <br />Peter Head (Camb.)Peter M. Headhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03379103292621457026noreply@blogger.com